With this issue, Unico debuts its Correlations Calculator, a convenient tool for predicting the fluid properties of a well from limited information.

Measurements of the physical properties of a fluid are essential to reservoir and production engineering. To perform their calculations, petroleum engineers need to know a fluid's viscosity, density, dissolved gas content, and other factors, as well as how these properties vary with temperature and pressure.

Such information, however, is not usually readily available. In the early stages of a well it can be difficult or economically impractical to obtain reliable measurements. Fluid samples, if available, can be subjected to pressure-volume-temperature analyses to determine their properties, but samples are often suspect and PVT analyses usually apply only at reservoir temperature.

One solution is to use what are known as correlations. By studying field data and fitting curves to measured results, engineers have developed empirical relationships that relate various fluid properties. These correlations are useful tools for estimating fluid properties from limited information. A variety of methods have been developed and published in the literature over the years that produce varying degrees of success depending upon the application.

Correlations can be grouped into two basic categories—those that assess gas content and those that predict viscosity. Correlations in the first group are helpful in estimating the amount of gas dissolved in the fluid and at what pressure that gas will evolve. They also estimate the influence of gas on fluid volume and density. Correlations in the second group predict the viscosity of the fluid for gas-free or "dead" oil, saturated oil, and undersaturated oil.

We will be introducing various correlation methods from both categories in upcoming issues of Solutions. The first two correlations we'd like to examine are the Standing and Beal methods.

Standing's Correlation
The Standing correlation, presented by M. B. Standing in 1952, estimates bubble-point pressure, gas/oil ratio, oil formation volume factor, and oil density based upon 105 experimental readings from California wells exhibiting the following range of data:

Bubble-point pressures: 130 to 7,000 psia
Reservoir temperature: 100° to 258° F
Gas/oil ratio: 20 to 1,425 scf/STB
API: 16.5° to 63.8°
Gas gravity: 0.59 to 0.95

With the Standing correlation, gas/oil ratio is determined from the oil API gravity and the investigated pressure and temperature. Bubble-point pressure and oil formation volume factor are dependent upon the API gravity, gas/oil ratio, and investigated temperature. Oil density is calculated using the oil formation volume factor and the oil API gravity, gas/oil ratio, and investigated temperature.

The Standing method estimated bubble-point pressure within 4.8% or 106 psi when used with the study data. The method should provide reasonable results with wells having a similar composition to the study wells, which had virtually no nitrogen or hydrogen sulfide and minimal carbon dioxide.

Beal's Correlation
C. Beal (1946) introduced a correlation showing how oil gravity and reservoir temperature could predict viscosity in dead oils. The correlation was based on measurements from 665 oil samples. The original correlation was presented graphically, but it has since been converted to an equation for convenience.

Beal's correlation estimates dead oil viscosity using the oil API gravity and investigated temperature. Saturated oil viscosity is based upon the dead oil viscosity and adjusted for the gas content using the gas/oil ratio. The unsaturated oil viscosity is calculated using the saturated viscosity, bubble-point pressure, and investigated pressure. Gas/oil ratio and bubble-point pressure can be estimated using a correlation such as Standing's.

Visit www.unicous.com/oilgas/corrcalc.php and try the Standing and Beal methods for yourself. As new correlations are introduced in Solutions, we will be adding them to the Correlations Calculator.

---

FEATURE FOCUS:

Automated Valve Check Keeps Sucker-Rod Pumps Healthy

Unico's sucker-rod pump (SRP) drive now incorporates a revolutionary valve-check feature that diagnoses pump condition without human intervention. The automated feature steps the pumping unit through the necessary motions, including stopping and dwelling during the upstroke and downstroke. After approximately 40 seconds, the drive reports the static leakage rates of the traveling and standing valves as well as the plunger clearance.

The valve check feature gives users the ability to closely monitor the health of their pumps and to quickly identify and repair pump problems. Since valve checks can be done frequently, failures can be detected early to eliminate the costly loss of production and wasted power consumption associated with operating worn or broken pumps. A valve check can be initiated either from the drive's keypad or remotely over a communication link. For added convenience, a software option allows the test to be scheduled automatically at a preset time each day. Head-end well management software can also be programmed to automatically display the results of the valve checks as well as an alert message if pump leakage exceeds a threshold value.

The valve-check feature is yet another example of how Unico's innovation helps you get the most from your artificial lift systems. For more information on the feature, stop by booths #34 and #35 at the SWPSC show or contact us.

Numerous Feature Improvements in Recent Releases of Unico's Sucker-Rod Pump (SRP) Control Software

The following are some of the improvements made through the latest version (.106) of Unico's
805-541 Sucker-Rod Pump (SRP) control software.

Version .106 Improvements
	Added automated valve check (see article above)
	Added automatic daily production gauging (production recording)
	Added last valve check time and date stamp
	Added automatic pump clearance identification (during valve check)
	Added automatic pump fill trigger determination (determined every stroke)
	Added user SPM adjustment
	Added a well ID progress bar display
	Added analog tubing pressure input support
	Added analog casing pressure input support
	Added motor peak power monitor and display
	Added a cold start current limiter
	Added storage of the four latest surface dynamometer cards
	Improved the well ID routine for compatibility with gas-powered generator systems
	Improved the well ID routine compatibility with HG pump jacks
	Improved the well ID routine for symmetrical pumping units
	Improved the “calibrate inclinometer” signal
	Improved the “counterbalance assist” signal
	Improved the gearbox torque limiting (torque limit)